Are Fuel Cell Cars The Answer?


Simple Fuel Cell

A Simple Fuel Cell

According to Gas 2.0, Ford, Mercedes Benz and Nissan have decided to pool their resources to bring affordable fuel cell vehicles to market as soon as possible. Most of us have no idea what a fuel cell is or why we would want a car powered by one. So let’s make it simple. A fuel cell combines hydrogen with air to create electricity.The only “waste product” is water vapor. Pretty cool, huh? Here’s an article about fuel cells at WikiPedia, if you want to know more about the technology.

Some of you may know that there were electric cars before the gasoline engine was invented. Today, Nissan offers an all electric vehicle called the LEAF. But electric cars from yesterday and today have the same drawbacks – heavy batteries and a short driving range. And when the batteries are fully discharged, it takes forever to recharge them.

A fuel cell car generates its own electricity, so it doesn’t need a heavy storage battery. It can go 300 miles or more on one tank of hydrogen.  And fill ups should require about the same time as it takes to fill the gas tank in a conventional car.

Honda Clarity

Cutaway view of Honda Clarity

If you live in California, Honda will lease you a fuel cell powered car for $600 a month. Why is the price so high? Because fuel cell technology today is about where computer technology was in 1977 when the Apple II computer first appeared. Translating fuel cell theory into real world products will take time and money. Lots of money. By joining forces, Ford, Mercedes and Nissan hope to beat the competition without going broke along the way.

You may have heard that there is no free lunch and that’s true when it comes to fuel cells. Yes, in operation, a fuel cell car has zero emissions. But the hydrogen has to come from somewhere. You just don’t find it lying about in nature. Chemically speaking, hydrogen bonds aggressively with lots of other elements, especially oxygen.

Water Molecules

Water Molecules

When hydrogen and oxygen embrace each other, we get water. But to pry hydrogen atoms loose from water takes energy. Lots and lots of energy. At the  moment, the process usually involves electricity. And electricity comes from electrical generating plants, the same facilities that spew millions of tons of pollutants into the air every year. So to say a fuel cell powered car has zero emissions is a bit misleading.

Let’s not lose hope, though. The folks at Gizmag.com have reported recently on several breakthroughs in the laboratory that may yield abundant hydrogen supplies at low cost. One is a new catalyst discovered at Princeton and Rutgers through computer modeling. The other, from Cambridge University in England, uses cobalt as a catalyst. Researchers at the University of Buffalo are exploring the use of nanoparticles in hydrogen production. All three of these breakthroughs were announced just last month. Who knows how far science and industry will have advanced fuel cell technology in 5 years? Or even a year from now?

Power LinesI write a lot about cars and transportation. But the hydrogen economy is an exciting development in all areas of human endeavor. Fuel cells could power every building on Earth, from homes to factories, offices and schools. Imagine a world without massive electric generating plants and the pollution they create, without phone poles and wires, and without power outages from weather or terrorist activities. Hydrogen power could change our future. And not a moment too soon.

Posted in General Automotive, Technology | Tagged | 1 Comment

Peugeot’s New Hybrid Technology Is A Lot Of Hot Air.


Peugeot Compressed Air HybridAnd that’s a good thing! Today’s automotive world is obsessed with hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric cars. All of them have one glaring weakness – the batteries they need to work are heavy and expensive. They also contain lithium, a highly toxic substance that is dangerous to work with both in the manufacturing and in the disposal process. Last but not least, hybrids with batteries typically operate in the 300 volt range, which poses a potential danger to occupants and rescue workers.

The clever folks at Peugeot took a look at the typical hybrid drive train and envisioned a better way of doing things, one that does away with the weight and expense of batteries, is more environmentally friendly to produce and recycle and doesn’t have the same risk of electrocution. They decided to replace the battery with a cylinder of compressed air.  Brilliant!

Peugeot  Compressed Air ConceptLike all hybrids, the Peugeot system uses a conventional internal combustion engine. The motor sometimes powers the drive train and sometimes operates a compressor. The system also recaptures some of the kinetic energy of the car under braking. Pressurized air is then stored in an onboard cylinder. At speeds above 40 mph, the engine does all the work. At lower speeds, the compressed air helps propel the car forward. And at low speeds, the car moves entirely by the power of compressed air.

The biggest benefit from all this is an automobile that equals or exceeds the fuel efficiency of a conventional hybrid at significantly less cost and with fewer environmental drawbacks. What’s not to like?

By thinking outside the battery, Peugeot has changed the rules of the hybrid game. There is little doubt that other manufacturers will adopt this technology for cars that are sold in the US. And that’s a very good thing for consumers and the environment.

Does this mean that Peugeot will soon be offering cars in America again? Probably not. Then again, if you could drive a new Peugeot RCZ sport coupe that got excellent fuel economy, wouldn’t you be tempted to buy one? I know I would.

Peugeot RCZ

Posted in Compressed Air Hybrid, Fuel Economy, General Automotive, Hybrids | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Future Of Energy, Part II


Sometimes I’Solar Panel Schematicm so smart, I scare myself. Recently, I boldly predicted that all the world’s energy needs can and should be met by solar power. And now, just a few days later,  the World Wildlife Fund has released a new report that reaches the same conclusion. It says that devoting just 1% of the Earth’s land mass to solar energy collection could meet 100% of our earthly energy needs in the future. The WWF thinks we could get to 30% by 2050.

Solar energy is not just covering the Earth with solar panels. If you have ever used a magnifying glass to burn letters onto a piece of wood, you understand the idea behind a new facility in Abu Dhabi. A lens concentrates the sun’s rays into a powerful beam that boils water into steam. The steam then powers a conventional electric generator. Scientists in Britain are searching for ways to harness the process of photosynthesis to create power.

“But wait!” I hear you cry. “The sun doesn’t shine 24 hours a day every day of the year. We still need coal, oil, natural gas and nuclear generating plants to supply our power when solar energy is not available.” That is true,but only partially so. In my prior post, I suggested that systems to store excess power will be necessary. One simple method is to pump water uphill during sunlight hours and let it flow back downhill when needed to spin  turbines.

Turbine GeneratorSon of gun. Those crafty folks in Belgium are taking my water tower idea and making it horizontal. They propose to build an artificial island in the North Sea filled with a fluid like water. During periods of excess energy production from wind farms, the water would be pumped from the center of the island to its margins. Later, the fluid would be allowed to flow back toward the empty center, driving turbines while doing so. Apple proposes to use excess power from wind turbines to heat a liquid. That heat could later be recaptured and used to turn generators. Whether the excess power comes from solar, wind or geothermal sources makes no difference. The idea of storing excess power for later use is exactly the same.

Solar Roof Shingles

Solar Roof Shingles

The field of alternative energy is bubbling with fresh, creative ideas which need to be pursued aggressively to free ourselves from the curse of fossil fuels. Tar sands, fracking and Artic oil exploration are all obsolete ideas designed to preserve the profits of global corporations pursuing an outdated business model. Sticking to the old ways will lead to more pollution of our skies, lands and oceans. Only solar energy will unlock a global future full of promise for all.  Achieving independence from fossil fuels will be a long and challenging task, but as the Chinese proverb says, “A journey of a thousand miles begins with but a single step.” It’s time for that journey to begin.

Source: Inhabitat.com

 

Posted in Energy Policy, Solar Power, Technology | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Does Stuff Make You Happy?


I have always wanted a 1952 Jaguar XK 120. My pediatrician owned one. He was a friend of the family and one summer day he took me for a ride in it. I still remember being 7 years old and sitting in that great thundering beast of a car. The wind in my face, the deep baritone of the exhaust in my ears and the aroma of leather and hot oil in my nostrils. What a car!

Jaguar XK 120 Roadster

When I was a young 1st Lieutenant in 1971, I bought a silver Jaguar XK-E coupe, a car that has often been referred to as the most beautiful production car ever built.  I remember thinking at the time that if I just had that car, I would be happy forever. And who wouldn’t be? Just look at it. Gorgeous, isn’t it?

XK-E Coupe

But sad to say, that car didn’t make me happy. It actually made me miserable. It broke down constantly, leaked oil in great quantities and cost me a fortune to keep it running. Owning it was not nearly as much fun as wanting to own it.

It turns out my experience is not unusual. A study by Marsha Richins at the University of Missouri and reported in The Atlantic, shows that for those of us who crave “stuff”,

“after the purchase was made, and the materialists inevitably adapted to life in possession of said coveted item, what followed was a “hedonic decline,” in which their happy feelings dissipated. “

I dream of the day when people who write learned treatises use language that is accessible to ordinary readers.  “Hedonic decline”? Oh, please. Give me a break. Here’s more from  the study summary:

“In each study, the reigning materialists anticipated future purchases with strong, positive emotions, much more so than other consumers. Joy, excitement, optimism, and even peacefulness coursed through them regardless of whether they were thinking about buying a house or a toaster, next week or next year.

The materialists were also more likely “to believe that an upcoming purchase would transform their lives in important and meaningful ways.” They had faith in their upcoming acquisition’s power to improve their relationships, boost their self-esteem, enable them to experience more pleasure, and, of course, be more efficient. The intensity with which they felt the positive emotions was directly related to just how transformative they expected those transformations to be.”

In other words, for most of us, thinking about acquiring stuff makes us happier than actually owning stuff. That’s why we spend so much time online searching for things we would like to own or places we would like to go or things we would like to do. The study suggests that the anticipation of those things makes us happier than if we actually got our wish.

My old Irish grandmother used to say, “Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it.” Now the scientific results are in and they clearly prove the person who dies with the most toys doesn’t win, but instead reaches the end times riddled with angst and suffering from “hedonic decline”.  I prefer to think those who die with the most friends win. But when my time comes, I sure would like those friends to bury me in a brand new, 2014 Corvette. And make it Torch Red, please!

2014 Corvette

Posted in General Automotive | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Future Of Energy


When humans first appeared on Earth, the only power they had available came from their own muscles. As time went on, they learned to harness the power of animals to till their fields and the wind to cross the oceans, but mankind still relied on muscle power to get things done.

Watt Steam EngineThen along came James Watt, who gave us the steam engine to do our work for us. Life was good. The discovery of petroleum spurred machines called automobiles and airplanes. Electricity became our friend, allowing us to do virtually anything with the touch of a button. Life was very good, indeed.

Sadly, the supply of petroleum on Earth is not infinite. In less than 200 years, mankind will burn through most, if not all, of the fossil fuel that took millions of years to produce. The question is no longer if we will run out of fossil fuels but when.

Power is prosperity. It is the answer to poverty. If there were enough power available, at little to no cost, to meet the needs of every person on Earth, what wondrous things might mankind accomplish?

Fortunately, the is such a power source and it is just 93,000,000 miles away. It’s called the sun. It’s free. It’s non=polluting. And it will be around for a billion  years or so. If climate change is the most pressing problem confronting mankind for the foreseeable future, solar power is the answer.

PrismJust last week, new advances in nano-technology were announced that will make tomorrow’s solar panels twice as efficient as the best panels available today. Nano-technology may even allow future panels to harvest the infrared radiation from the Earth after the sun goes down.

Critics are quick to point out that solar panels do not work 24 hours a day and that some of us like to read or watch TV during the night. The response is that during the daylight hours, solar panels can produce more electricity than is needed. This excess can be stored in a number of ways.

Batteries are an easy solution, but batteries have some drawbacks of the own, the most important of which is that they are hazardous to the environment when they are produced and when they are disposed of. Just recently, eco-friendly batteries that rely on vegetable matter and iron have made news.

Water TowerOther methods include using the extra power during the day to pump water uphill into a storage area. Later, the water is released to turn generators while it runs back downhill. Think Hoover Dam, here. Apple has just filed for a patent on a system that used excess energy to heat a fluid. Later, that heat is used to create steam to spin a turbine.

Enough sunlight strikes the Earth every minute to meet the needs of all 6 billion people currently alive for an entire day. The means to harness that power is within our grasp. Isn’t it time we got busy providing abundant non-polluting energy for all people instead of fighting wars over the last few drops of fossil fuel?

Posted in Energy Policy, Solar Power, Technology | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Car Of The 21st Century


Lotus 38 at IndyEvery once in a while, a race car comes along that not only changes the game, it rips up the rule book and throws it in the trash.  Up until 1965, the Indianapolis 500 was dominated by big, bulky, front engine cars. Then Colin Chapman brought his small, light and lithe Lotus 38 mid engine race car to Indy and stood the world of motor racing on its head.

STP Indy Racer2 years later, Andy Granitelli brought a turbine powered, 4 wheel drive car to Indianapolis. Parnelli Jones drove it to a commanding lead but the car suffered a mechanical failure just 3 laps from the end of the race. The race sanctioning body quickly banned turbine engines and four wheel drive. The car never raced again.

Chapparal 2FAlso in the 60’s, a Texan named Jim Hall pioneered innovations in aerodynamics that continue to influence motor racing even today. Perhaps the most outrageous of his creations was the Chapparal 2F, which featured a wing as big as a billboard.  Whether you love or hate the modern emphasis on “aero” in racing, it’s all Jim Hall’s fault. In the past 50 years, though, race car technology has followed a path of evolution, not revolution.

No longer. Race car engineer and designer Ben Bowlby has given the racing world the Delta Wing race car. For an in depth look at its development, read the interview with Bowlby in Racecar Engineering. Like Colin Chapman before him, Bowlby strives for minimum weight. Unlike Jim Hall, he seeks the lowest possible aerodynamic drag. Couple these design objectives together and you get a race car that uses a smaller, more fuel efficient engine.

Bowlby likes to say his car is half the weight of a conventional race car, has half the aerodynamic drag, half the horsepower and consumes half as much fuel. That means the Delta Wing spends less time in the pits taking on fuel and tires during a race. Less time in the pits means getting to the finish line ahead of everyone else. Here is his Delta Wing creation as seen from above.

 Delta Wing Race Car

The design is too outrageous, too weird and too different for most people. Recently, IndyCar rejected the Delta Wing design for its new standard racing chassis. No engine manufacturer wanted to be associated with a car so strange. But Nissan saw the potential in the Delta Wing design and signed on to become a major sponsor of the project.

In 2012, the LeMans racing series permitted the car to run in competition on a non-point scoring basis. Everyone wanted to see if the car would be fast enough to be competitive and would actually go around corners at racing speeds. It did both and very well, too. Here’s a video of the Delta Wing on track.

With the Delta Wing, Ben Bowlby and his colleagues didn’t just think outside the box. They smashed it and dragged the pieces out to the curb. My prediction is that it will influence the thinking of other race car designers for years, perhaps decades, to come. And that’s why it gets my vote as the Car Of The 21st Century.

Posted in Racing, Technology, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

How Much Does Your Car Cost To Own?


Nissan Leaf

Nissan LEAF

The new car market currently offers 4 types of cars: Conventional Cars, Hybrids, Plug-In Hybrids and Electrics. Prices vary from about $10,000 to $40,000, with luxury and premium models costing much more. Many manufacturers are offering low interest loans and the federal government will give buyers of certain models up to a $7500 tax credit.

But the cost of ownership of an automobile involves far more than the purchase price. In order to get a true picture of who much you are spending, you must know the purchase price, the finance rate on your car loan, the cost of insurance, the cost of fuel, the cost of repairs, how much local and state taxes you pay on your car and what your car will be worth when it comes time to sell or trade it.

NumbersFew people bother to do all this legwork. They only focus on the sticker price and the monthly payment and figure that’s the whole story. They would be shocked to find that repairs, depreciation, fuel, taxes and insurance often amount to more than their monthly payment.

Depreciation is especially tricky, because it can’t be computed with accuracy until the day to trade or sell the car arrives. There are ways to estimate depreciation, but all estimates are only a guide.

Recently, Kelly Blue Book released  information that shows many hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles suffer more depreciation than conventional models. For example, they predict that the Nissan LEAF, an electric car, will lose 80% of its value after 5 years. That’s a stunning number, especially when you consider that the average conventional car will cost much less to buy and only lose about 60% of its value over the same period of time. To offset some of this pain, a new study from Germany predicts that the cost to maintain an electric car may be as much as 35% less than for any other type of car.

Lithium Ion BatteryThere is another factor in the equation for hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric cars and that is the cost of replacing the battery at the end of its service life. That alone can add $4000 to $8000 dollars to your cost of ownership. Right now, no one really knows how long those batteries will last. That unknown may be what is driving down the resale value of these cars, as buyers shopping for a used model don’t want to get stuck with that expense and who can blame them?

For now, all the hoopla and hype about hybrids, plug-in hybrids and electric cars boils down to this: It’s impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy just how much the total cost of ownership of that car will be. Which means it is impossible to calculate whether the fuel savings they offer will ever equal or exceed the higher sticker prices such cars command, with or without federal tax incentives.

Honda CivicI just took my Honda Civic on a road trip this past weekend and got 38 mpg. The Civic has one of the highest resale values in the market and some of the lowest maintenance costs. And it looks good, too!

Despite all the hype about new technology, a well built conventional car still offers excellent value for  your money.

Posted in General Automotive, Hybrids, Technology | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Merry Christmas!


For car enthusiasts everywhere, Merry Christmas from Rhode Trips.

Santa's Bright Red Morgan Sleigh

Posted in General Automotive, Vintage Vehicles | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Would YOU Buy A Diesel?


imagesWhen gasoline prices in America first hit $4.00 per gallon, consumers suddenly started demanding more fuel efficient cars. Gas guzzlers like the Hummer disappeared overnight. Sales of full size trucks and SUV’s plummeted. Manufacturers were desperate to build more fuel efficient products that would bring buyers back into showrooms.

Toyota introduced us to hybrids with the Prius. It has taken the rest of the auto industry 10 years to catch up, but suddenly there are hybrids available from every major manufacturer with more on their way. The new darling of the automotive world is the plug-in hybrid that allows drivers to go farther on electric power alone. Nissan offers the LEAF, an electric only automobile.

Final_Plug-in_5Electric cars are nothing new. They were around before the gasoline engine was invented. In fact, the very first Porsche, built in 1898, was an electric vehicle. So we have  come full circle, back where we started more than 100 years ago. But car shoppers…..we have a problem. The average price of a hybrid today is around $30,000. Make it a plug-in hybrid and the price climbs to $40,000. That’s a lot of money no matter how many miles per gallon it gets. People who buy plug-in hybrids will have to drive them 8 years or more before the money they save at the pump equals the extra money they shelled out at the time of purchase. Yikes!

So what’s the answer? Is there a viable alternative that is more fuel efficient than a gasoline engine but less costly than a hybrid? Fortunately, there is. It’s called the diesel engine and it has been around since 1893.

audi_a3_2.0_tdi_eng_10

Audi 2.0 liter turbo-diesel engine

In Europe, about half of all new cars are diesel powered. In America, that number is less than 5%. Why the difference? There are some economic factors. The price of diesel fuel on the Continent is less than gasoline and most diesel cars cost only a few Euros more than their gasoline powered cousins. In the US, diesel fuel costs more than regular gasoline and our emission standards drive up the cost of diesel cars considerably. For instance, Volkswagen estimates it costs $5000 per car to comply with US emissions standards.

So what’s the big deal about diesels? That’s simple. A diesel engine is more fuel efficient than a gas engine. About 18% more, in fact. The driver of a diesel car will get about the same mpg as the driver of a hybrid, but pay less to drive one off the lot. Diesel models have a higher resale value than either gas powered cars or hybrids. All of which makes a diesel a smart economic choice.

VW Jetta SportWagon TDI

VW Jetta SportWagen TDI

But aren’t diesels noisy, smoky, and slow? Not any more. Over the past 30 years, new technology has addressed those issues and made diesels quieter, smoke free and powerful. Now, Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Porsche and Volkswagen have joined forces to promote their diesel engine models here in America. The campaign is called Clean Diesel. Clearly Better and will be launched at the Detroit International Auto Show this January. Volkswagen has already begun the push, rolling out a clever television ad recently that features two young men listening to Spanish lessons at the start of a road trip. When they finally stop for fuel – 700 miles later – they are speaking Spanish fluently. It’s funny but effective.

Opel Meriva

The Mighty Opel Meriva

I was in France last May, driving from Geneva to Monaco and back in a diesel powered Opel. My driving partner and I didn’t take the high speed Auto Route. Oh, no. We deliberately sought out the steepest, twistiest roads we could find so we could conquer the Alps just as the Roman legions did 1,000 years ago. When it came time to fill up, I was astonished to find our trusty Opel averaged more than 40 mpg in this rigorous driving.

Would you buy a diesel car? I know I would.

Posted in Diesel Power, Fuel Economy, General Automotive | 17 Comments

The Fracking Controversy


Energy industry executives say there is enough natural gas in the ground under the United States to provide America with abundant energy far into the foreseeable future. They claim our natural gas reserves equal or exceed the oil reserves remaining in the Middle East.

Think what tapping that energy could mean. No more dependency on foreign oil. America would become energy independent for the first time in the past 50 years. We would no longer have to kowtow to emirs, sheiks and other unstable potentates for the fuel we need to keep our economy strong.

That’s pretty heady stuff, isn’t it? Yes, it is. But there’s a catch. Most of that gas is trapped in layers of shale deep underground. Getting to it and releasing it from the rock is difficult. To do so, the energy companies employ a process known as “fracking”, short for “hydraulic fracturing.”

Marcellus Shale deposits in the northeastern US. Source: WikiPedia

Location of Marcellus shale deposits in the northeastern US

In order to release the gas, energy companies drill down into the shale, then force a mixture of water, sand and chemicals under tremendous pressure into it, fracturing the rock and releasing the trapped gas. The sand keeps the layers of shale separated so the gas can flow outward. The chemicals, we are told, enhance the process. So far, so good.

Except that people in the communities near where fracking has taken place report small earthquakes and contaminated wells. Some say their tap water sometimes bursts into flames. The energy companies say there’s no connection between these phenomena and their fracking operations. They have started large scale advertising campaigns to tout how safe the fracking process is. These campaigns emphasize how important access to these reserves is for our nation. They imply that opponents are unpatriotic.

The controversy has become quite heated. What makes many people angry is that the companies refuse to say exactly what chemicals they are pumping into the ground, claiming that information is a trade secret. The companies ask us to trust that the process is safe. Opponents argue that we can’t assess the risks to ourselves and our families if we don’t know what the companies are putting into the ground.

How the fracking process works.

How the fracking process works. Source: ProPublica

Early in 2012, the Energy Institute of the University of Texas at Austin (UTA) released a report entitled ‘Fact-Based Regulation for Environmental Protection in the Shale Gas Development,’ which claimed there was no relationship between fracking and ground water contamination. The study was once posted on the UTA website but is no longer available. All reference to it at the UTA Energy Institute webpage has been expunged.

That’s because of a review of the report by the Public Accountability Initiative entitled How a University of Texas Fracking Study Led by a Gas Industry Insider Spun the Facts and Misled the Public. The PAI review found that the principal author of the UTA study, Dr. Charles Groat, sat on the board of  Plains Exploration and Production Company, a drilling company that relies heavily on fracking, for the past five years. During that time he was paid $1,500,000 for his services.

Oh.

Trust the energy companies? Sure. Trust them as much as we trusted the tobacco companies, Enron, Bank of America and Goldman Sachs? No problem. After all, they wouldn’t lie, would they?

To some, the promise of shale gas is an illusion, one that will turn our country into a contaminated morass the way the coal industry has done to West Virginia. For them, the danger of fracking is just one part of the global dilemma associated with making oil, gas and coal the basis of our prosperity. Historically, America’s military has been exploited as much to protect natural resources as it has liberty and freedom. Looking ahead, continued reliance on extractive  technology will divert our attention from the critically important process of learning how to harness clean, renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, geothermal and tidal power.

Enough energy from the sun lands on the surface of the Earth in one hour to meet our entire global energy needs for a year. But by the time we learn to harness that power, will we have irretrievably polluted our earthly home to the point where it is unfit for human habitation?

Coal Slag

Posted in Energy Policy, Fracking, Technology | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments